In a collective sigh of relief for all bloggers in Canada, the Canadian Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that online publications cannot be found liable for linking to defamatory material -- as long as the linking itself is not defamatory.
From the Globe and Mail article on the ruling:
"Only when a hyperlinker presents content from the hyperlinked material in a way that actually repeats the defamatory content, should that content be considered 'published' by the hyperlinker."
"The court recognizes that simply posting a link to material that may be libellous is a far cry from publishing or repeating the libel, let alone endorsing what has been said in the linked post," he said.
|"Love, Lies, and Online Dating." Experts Discuss Love 2.0|
|ColorCo.de: Generate Colour Palettes|
|Everything You Need to Know About the Net Neutrality Strike Down|
|"They said they had been unaware that domains associated with their homeland were being sold for profit."|
|#SOPA: How Big Hollywood Lost -- Or Did They?|
|“Social media is the publisher, not just the postman.”|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|“Bulgaria is hemorrhaging citizens at a rate of 164 per day.”|
|What Nothing Really Means in Seinfeld|
|How to Make a Cheesecake that Looks Like Cheese|
|iPhone 6, the First Smartphone to Disrupt NSA's Spying|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|“Featuring over 2,000 flags in motion to Ludwig van Beethoven.”|
|“How easy it is for anyone who tracks our digital activities to gain insight into our personalities.”|
|“Without ads, how does Netflix manage to make money?”|
|Fake Name Generator|