In a collective sigh of relief for all bloggers in Canada, the Canadian Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that online publications cannot be found liable for linking to defamatory material -- as long as the linking itself is not defamatory.
From the Globe and Mail article on the ruling:
"Only when a hyperlinker presents content from the hyperlinked material in a way that actually repeats the defamatory content, should that content be considered 'published' by the hyperlinker."
"The court recognizes that simply posting a link to material that may be libellous is a far cry from publishing or repeating the libel, let alone endorsing what has been said in the linked post," he said.
|First Ever Criminal Prosecution for Domain Name Theft Underway|
|The Bastard Assistant Editor From Hell|
|Remember the Internet?|
|#Anonymous LulzSec Taken Down by Their Own Leader|
|Canadians Overpay for Slow Access to Internet|
|“Recent advances in the field of artificial intelligence.”|
|“A two-legged robot created by Agility Robotics, designed to get your delivery from a car to your door.”|
|“Many [Silicon Valley] parents now have serious concerns about tech's impact on kids' psychological and social development.”|
|Recycled Vacuum Lamps|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|“The company is losing billions, has essentially no underlying value, and its business could be hammered overnight.”|
|“A deep fake sex video emerges in a Google search of your name.”|
|Naked Preacher Lady [NSFW]|
|“Self-driving trucks will begin hauling mail between USPS facilities.”|
|“How these systems are being fused together to design new regimes of totalitarian surveillance and control.”|
|“Some of the things that I have to tell you might induce some feelings of anxiety.”|