Breaking the Myth Behind HDMI Cables: Brands and Cost Don't Matter


Sun, May 15th, 2011 01:04 by capnasty NEWS

According to Will Greenwald of PC Magazine, the only difference between a $5 HDMI cable and one that costs $100 is just the price. To prove this, Greenwald tested the performance of cables ranging from cheap to insane, shattering the myth that more expensive cables put forth greater video or audio fidelity.

As the author explains:

You've probably experienced this when shopping for a new HDTV: A store clerk sidles up and offers to help. He then points you toward the necessary HDMI cables to go with your new television. And they're expensive. Maybe $60 or $70, sometimes even more than $100 (You could buy a cheap Blu-ray player or a handful of Blu-ray discs for that price!). The clerk then claims that these are special cables. Superior cables. Cables you absolutely need if you want the best possible home theater experience. And the claims are, for the vast majority of home theater users, utter rubbish.

The truth is, for most HDTV setups, there is absolutely no effective difference between a no-name $3 HDMI cable you can order from and a $120 Monster cable you buy at a brick-and-mortar electronics store. We ran five different HDMI cables, ranging in price from less than $5 up to more than $100, through rigorous tests to determine whether there's any difference in a dirt-cheap cable and one that costs a fortune.



You may also be interested in:

All Sitcoms Use the Same Simple Formula
Popcorn Time in a Browser
Star Trek Cited by Texas Supreme Court
Photographs of Tube Televisions the Moment They Are Turned Off
100 Most Iconic Shots of All Time