Bizarre article on The Atlantic about a social-engineering study organized by Web Ecology Project. The goal, to determine if it was possible not only to infiltrate social networks, but also to influence them on a large scale by using social robots.
The group invited three teams to program "social bots" -- fake identities -- that could mimic human conversation on Twitter, and then picked 500 real users on the social network, the core of whom shared a fondness for cats. The Kiwis armed @JamesMTitus with a database of generic responses ("Oh, that's very interesting, tell me more about that") and designed it to systematically test parts of the network for what tweets generated the most responses, and then to talk to the most responsive people.
In the case of @JamesMTitus, the robot gained 109 followers in two weeks and all three robots had successfully insinuated themselves into the centre of the target network.
|“The 'last mile' to the home accounts for 50 percent or more of total package delivery costs.”|
|"Robots don’t respect the social and moral niceties that humans are socialized to observe."|
|Leaping Robot Hops Closer to War|
|Vision-Based High-Speed Manipulation for Robotic Ultra-Precise Weed Control|
|Boston Dynamics' Fast Running Wildcat Robot|
|Can a Ceiling Fan be Converted into a Turbine Generator?|
|“But what about when those technologies destroy the environment?”|
|“The rich do not live like this. The rich have grown afraid of screens.”|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|What Nothing Really Means in Seinfeld|
|Fake Name Generator|
|U.S.S. Enterprise Owner's Manual|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|“It's not more expensive to build and it's hugely cheaper and more efficient to live in.”|
|If Sir David Attenborough Restored Vintage Toys|
|Naked Preacher Lady [NSFW]|