Bizarre article on The Atlantic about a social-engineering study organized by Web Ecology Project. The goal, to determine if it was possible not only to infiltrate social networks, but also to influence them on a large scale by using social robots.
The group invited three teams to program "social bots" -- fake identities -- that could mimic human conversation on Twitter, and then picked 500 real users on the social network, the core of whom shared a fondness for cats. The Kiwis armed @JamesMTitus with a database of generic responses ("Oh, that's very interesting, tell me more about that") and designed it to systematically test parts of the network for what tweets generated the most responses, and then to talk to the most responsive people.
In the case of @JamesMTitus, the robot gained 109 followers in two weeks and all three robots had successfully insinuated themselves into the centre of the target network.
|A Better Leg for Bipedial Robots|
|Robots are a Greater Threat to Employment than Globalisation|
|Distributed Flight Array: Modular Flying Robots|
|South Korean Shipyard Workers to Wear Robotic Exoskeletons|
|Boston Dynamics Plans to Build 1,000 Robot Dogs Per Year by 2019|
|“Long live the instant gratification economy—and the increasingly sophisticated technology that’s enabling it.”|
|“The robot age is nothing to be worried about.”|
|Japanese Robot Serves Ice Cream From Inside a Vending Machine|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|Gira Lab Universal Timer|
|Why, Typewriters Are Alive and Well, Thank you|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|“Authoritarianism depends upon people getting used to hearing the things that they want to hear.”|
|“Robots are key to a new wave of local agriculture.”|
|“What jobs will be created and what jobs will disappear?”|
|“Rejuvenation is Finally an Industry.”|