Facebook and Twitter, notes Ashlee Vance and Miguel Helft in this article in the New York Times, have been perceived as outlets of "free speech". In a way, this is true: oppressive governments are finding it increasingly more difficult in trying to shut-up their citizens from voicing their concerns.
But one must not forget that Facebook and Twitter are, ultimately, corporations, more interested in the bottom line. This bottom line is provided by advertising. And advertisers will only advertise on places that they feel does not make their brand look bad.
"This leaves [Facebook and Twitter] with tough public relations and business decisions around how they should handle situations as politically charged as the WikiLeaks developments", and situations like WikiLeaks "highlights the complexities of free speech issues on the Internet, as grassroots Web companies evolve and take central control over what their users can make public."
|'Dictionary of Numbers' Puts Numbers in Human-Understandable Terms|
|Dating Sites Would Prefer to Keep You Single|
|"Guest blogging is done; it's just gotten too spammy."|
|Jogger injured after using Twitter as he ran|
|Teens Experiencing Facebook Fatigue|
|“Social media is the publisher, not just the postman.”|
|“Bulgaria is hemorrhaging citizens at a rate of 164 per day.”|
|What Nothing Really Means in Seinfeld|
|How to Make a Cheesecake that Looks Like Cheese|
|iPhone 6, the First Smartphone to Disrupt NSA's Spying|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|“Featuring over 2,000 flags in motion to Ludwig van Beethoven.”|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|Fake Name Generator|
|U.S.S. Enterprise Owner's Manual|
|“Without ads, how does Netflix manage to make money?”|