“Huge privacy violations have become commonplace.”

An argument on privacy violation being real harm

#Privacy

Mon, Jan 7th, 2019 09:00 by capnasty NEWS

In The New York Times, lawyer Neema Singh Guliani argues that one should not have to prove how a privacy violation has caused harm because the violation in itself is the harm.

If you applied Facebook’s twisted interpretation of the law in this case to other contexts, sharing your intimate messages without your permission or handing over detailed profiles of you to political operatives without your consent — even if in direct violation of the law — alone shouldn’t cost the company a penny in court. Facebook is paradoxically arguing that privacy itself has no price, even in cases where it’s this precise lack of privacy that allows it to turn a profit.

  340

 

You may also be interested in:

Naked Password
"Everything about the world Orwell envisioned has become so obvious that one keeps running up against the novel's narrative shortcomings."
Connecting to a Public WiFi Makes Your Phone Vulnerable to Attack
“Tech companies are picking a big public fight with the NSA because it looks good.”
"It’s increasingly hard to opt-out of online tracking."