“The internet is the root of multiple woes, from increasing political polarization to the mass diffusion of misinformation.”

Where the Internet went all wrong


Sat, Aug 25th, 2018 11:00 by capnasty NEWS

In the MIT Technology Review, Tim Hwang explores the similarities between early Christians and Russian revolutionaries with 21st-century digital evangelists — evangelists answering the cry as to what went wrong with the Internet. Hwang looks at all four of the ways idealist explain what happened.

The question is, do these tribes matter? Or are the Pessimists ultimately right that the internet is essentially destructive to society? Does the flowering of DFIO cliques, as Slezkine’s book suggests, simply represent the final throes of a dying movement?

I say no. Both Optimism and Pessimism make the mistake of assuming that the internet has inherent features, but like any technology conceived of and built by humans, it is shaped by human struggles, by the push and pull of a multitude of interests and schools of thought. What’s needed is a coalition around a New Optimism—one that celebrates what’s working, is honest about what isn’t, and articulates a path forward grounded not so much in technological fixes as in a richer understanding of trust, identity, and community.



You may also be interested in:

Net-Neutrality Backers, Telcos Spar Over Stimulus' Broadband Rules
Docracy Terms of Service Tracker
So You're Mad About Something on the Internet...
Most Social Media Users Expect Cries for Help To Be Answered Quickly
“Any person, organization or government serious about web security should return to plain-text.”