Wired argues that while there have been announcements about the possibility of usable carbon removal technologies at an affordable cost they are being hyped to the point where we may not take any action to mitigate the damage we are doing.
Scientists have long speculated that so-called "negative emissions" technologies like CO2 removal could not only slow the accumulation of carbon in the air, but even reverse it. Before last week, though, all that speculation was, well, largely speculative; nobody had convincingly demonstrated how to pull off negative emissions at scale. Previous estimates had pegged the cost of sucking carbon from the skies, for instance, at $600 per ton—way too pricey to qualify as a viable cleanup solution. The findings from Carbon Engineering, which appear in the latest issue of the journal Joule, point the way toward a future in which negative emissions are not only technically possible but financially feasible.
So yeah—it's big, significant, encouraging news. But it's not all blue skies and rainbows.
|“If you really want to save the planet, you should die.”|
|“Rubbish waste is now so prolific it will become fossilised.”|
|Setting Aside Half the Planet as a National Park|
|Nestle' Outbids Small Town on Use of Well|
|The Oceans are Dying (And We Pulled the Trigger)|
|“Self-driving trucks will begin hauling mail between USPS facilities.”|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|Recycled Vacuum Lamps|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|U.S.S. Enterprise Owner's Manual|
|Naked Preacher Lady [NSFW]|
|“A deep fake sex video emerges in a Google search of your name.”|
|“A driverless electric truck began daily freight deliveries on a public road.”|
|Fake Name Generator|
|“You can often hide from an AI video system with the aid of a simple color printout.”|
|Facebook, Twitter Users Could Face Insurance Hikes|
|“We are undergoing the greatest economic transformation in our history, and we are dealing with it by pretending nothing is happening.”|