Wired argues that while there have been announcements about the possibility of usable carbon removal technologies at an affordable cost they are being hyped to the point where we may not take any action to mitigate the damage we are doing.
Scientists have long speculated that so-called "negative emissions" technologies like CO2 removal could not only slow the accumulation of carbon in the air, but even reverse it. Before last week, though, all that speculation was, well, largely speculative; nobody had convincingly demonstrated how to pull off negative emissions at scale. Previous estimates had pegged the cost of sucking carbon from the skies, for instance, at $600 per ton—way too pricey to qualify as a viable cleanup solution. The findings from Carbon Engineering, which appear in the latest issue of the journal Joule, point the way toward a future in which negative emissions are not only technically possible but financially feasible.
So yeah—it's big, significant, encouraging news. But it's not all blue skies and rainbows.
|There Are Plastic Islands in the Pacific Ocean You Can Walk On|
|IKEA to Start Building Neighbourhoods|
|How to Explain a Dangerous Place to People 10,000 Years from Now|
|“A plastic count that is equivalent to 250 pieces of debris for every human in the world.”|
|Global Warming: "atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide hit a new record high."|
|“It's not more expensive to build and it's hugely cheaper and more efficient to live in.”|
|“But what about when those technologies destroy the environment?”|
|Can a Ceiling Fan be Converted into a Turbine Generator?|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|What Nothing Really Means in Seinfeld|
|Fake Name Generator|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|U.S.S. Enterprise Owner's Manual|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|Naked Preacher Lady [NSFW]|
|If Sir David Attenborough Restored Vintage Toys|
|“A chain of endlessly recommended YouTube videos made by strangers motivated by advertising dollars.”|