LifeHacker looks at a recent post by Facebook in which it acknowledges that using Facebook is bad for you — I'm guessing seeing other people's carefully curated feed posts of their perfect lives causes depression when comparing your non-perfect existence to them. Unsurprisingly, Facebook is not suggesting using social media less.
You can read the whole post by the Facebook researchers and never see any question about how much Facebook is an appropriate amount of Facebook. That’s not the question they want to answer, because the answer is probably “less.” Instead, they ask questions like:
* How can we make people happier with reading their news feeds?
* How can Facebook “support [teens] as they transition through different stages of life”?
Maybe a good conclusion at this point would be stop giving people incentives to scroll through their feed.
|“Rapid and relatively inexpensive cancer therapy.”|
|Artificial Graphene Retina Can Interface with Optical Nerve|
|"Honeybee collapse has much to teach us about how humans can avoid a similar fate."|
|Sleeping More Than 7 Hours Will Kill You|
|“What if aging didn’t have to suck?”|
|“Buying a new smartphone every two years is taking a toll on the planet.”|
|“New York Central trains in the Hudson River valley in 1928 and 1929”|
|“Google and Facebook figured out how to commodify 'reality' itself by tracking what people do.”|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|“Forget reading the book of life—we’re now learning how to write it.”|
|"Waymo is reportedly planning to take the next step towards offering a commercial driverless car service in early December."|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|“We need to make algorithms transparent, regulated, and forgiving of the flawed creatures that converse with them.”|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|“Bias, error, and misuse of Artificial Intelligence technologies.”|
|Make Your Own Espresso Cups Using Shapeways 3D Ceramic Printing Service|
|The Hard Sell of Low Tactics|