LifeHacker looks at a recent post by Facebook in which it acknowledges that using Facebook is bad for you — I'm guessing seeing other people's carefully curated feed posts of their perfect lives causes depression when comparing your non-perfect existence to them. Unsurprisingly, Facebook is not suggesting using social media less.
You can read the whole post by the Facebook researchers and never see any question about how much Facebook is an appropriate amount of Facebook. That’s not the question they want to answer, because the answer is probably “less.” Instead, they ask questions like:
* How can we make people happier with reading their news feeds?
* How can Facebook “support [teens] as they transition through different stages of life”?
Maybe a good conclusion at this point would be stop giving people incentives to scroll through their feed.
|First Penis Transplant a Success|
|Swine Flu vs. Normal Trip to Mexico|
|Experimental Ebola Drug Has Run Out|
|"Americans experience higher rates of disease and injury and die sooner than people in other high-income countries."|
|“By day, she visits morgues, observes autopsies, and studies pictures of crime scenes.”|
|“Social media is the publisher, not just the postman.”|
|“Featuring over 2,000 flags in motion to Ludwig van Beethoven.”|
|U.S.S. Enterprise Owner's Manual|
|What Nothing Really Means in Seinfeld|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|Fake Name Generator|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|“It’s taking orders for a real-life flying motorcycle powered by five modified jet engines.”|
|iPhone 6, the First Smartphone to Disrupt NSA's Spying|
|“Without ads, how does Netflix manage to make money?”|