With trust in politicians declining, Fran Mols and Jonathan Roberts from the University of Queensland, propose replacing government representatives with machine code. While this wouldn't resolve some moral or ethical issues, it may cut down on red tape, costs, and influence. The Watson 2016 Foundation had already proposed IBM's Watson to be the next U.S. president.
So even if we had a parliament full of robots, we would still need an agency staffed by humans charged with defining the ethical standards to be programmed into the robots.
And who gets to decide on those ethical standards? Well we’d probably have to put that to the vote between various interested and competing parties.
This bring us full circle, back to the problem of how to prevent undue influence.
|FBI Arrests Russian Spies In Deep Cover|
|Canada to Share Embassies With "Its Former Colonial Master"|
|Our Lady of the Law|
|A Few Days Left for Bush|
|Google Now Censors Searching for BitTorrent, But Not How To Build a Bomb (via @openattitude)|
|“The prospects and future of AI.”|
|“Social robots will be uniquely personal.”|
|Japanese Robot Serves Ice Cream From Inside a Vending Machine|
|“When Life Gives You Lemons.”|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|Why, Typewriters Are Alive and Well, Thank you|
|“Robots are key to a new wave of local agriculture.”|
|“Rejuvenation is Finally an Industry.”|
|“The world’s first hydrogen-powered train.”|