On The Guardian, Julia Carrie Wong looks at the iPal, a child-sized robot designed to keep children occupied "for hours without supervision," raising ethical questions about abandoning children in front of the device.
“It’s a robot for children,” said Avatar Mind founder Jiping Wang. “It’s mainly for companionship.” The iPal, he boasted, could keep children aged three to eight occupied for “a couple of hours” without adult supervision. It is perfect for the time when children arrive home from school a few hours before their parents get off work, he said.
The iPal takes the debate over the automation of human jobs to the next level. The ethics of how robots should interact with children is necessarily more fraught than the ethics of robots in the workforce. Childcare has rarely, if ever, been a particularly well-remunerated or respected job, but it is essential.
|"Automation will disrupt millions of Canadian jobs, not far in the future, but in the next dozen years."|
|"Robots don’t respect the social and moral niceties that humans are socialized to observe."|
|“Nobody mourns them or asks for their bodies to be returned from war.”|
|Robots are a Greater Threat to Employment than Globalisation|
|“The prospects and future of AI.”|
|“Social robots will be uniquely personal.”|
|Japanese Robot Serves Ice Cream From Inside a Vending Machine|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|“When Life Gives You Lemons.”|
|Why, Typewriters Are Alive and Well, Thank you|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|“Robots are key to a new wave of local agriculture.”|
|“Long live the instant gratification economy—and the increasingly sophisticated technology that’s enabling it.”|
|“Rejuvenation is Finally an Industry.”|