"If we were smart about the accounting, we’d be asking Facebook to pay us."


Tue, Aug 18th, 2015 10:00 by capnasty NEWS

Considering the value of the private information it gains from each user versus how much it costs to give users a free place to socialise, The New Yorker argues that Facebook should be paying its users for all the data Mark Zuckerberg has "accumulated about us."

Since the late eighteenth century or so, there have been three main business models in the entertainment and media business: selling content, selling advertisements, or both. Some media are predominantly driven by payment (books, movies, and Netflix), others by advertisements (Google and broadcast television); while some rely on both (cable, newspapers, and magazines). Along with the classic models, since the nineteen-nineties or so there has been a fourth way: giving your customers stuff in exchange for their personal data, which you then use to make money. Facebook is not the only company that operates this way but it is the champion, widely assumed to have more data than anyone else. That data is useful for advertising, which is Facebook’s main source of revenue. But the data is also an asset. The two-hundred-and-seventy-billion-dollar valuation of Facebook, which made a profit of three billion dollars last year, is based on some faith that piling up all of that data has value in and of itself. It’s like a virtual Fort Knox—with a gold mine attached to it. One reason Mark Zuckerberg is so rich is that the stock market assumes that, at some point, he’ll figure out a new way to extract profit from all the data he’s accumulated about us.



You may also be interested in:

Documenting Every Instance the Phrase "Is The New" Used Since 2005
"Your gateway to understanding life outside your home."
If San Francisco's Crime Were Elevations
Study on Facebook Shows We're More Closely Connected to One Another Than Previously Thought
Public Domain Super Heroes