On the MIT Technology Review, Tom Simonite explains how Wikipedia, with its shrinking volunteer workforce, is now mostly manned by a "90 percent male" loose collective which "operates a crushing bureaucracy with an often abrasive atmosphere", deterring newcomers from participating.
The sixth most widely used website in the world is not run anything like the others in the top 10. It is not operated by a sophisticated corporation but by a leaderless collection of volunteers who generally work under pseudonyms and habitually bicker with each other. It rarely tries new things in the hope of luring visitors; in fact, it has changed little in a decade. And yet every month 10 billion pages are viewed on the English version of Wikipedia alone. When a major news event takes place, such as the Boston Marathon bombings, complex, widely sourced entries spring up within hours and evolve by the minute. Because there is no other free information source like it, many online services rely on Wikipedia. Look something up on Google or ask Siri a question on your iPhone, and youll often get back tidbits of information pulled from the encyclopedia and delivered as straight-up facts.
Yet Wikipedia and its stated ambition to compile the sum of all human knowledge are in trouble. The volunteer workforce that built the projects flagship, the English-language Wikipediaand must defend it against vandalism, hoaxes, and manipulationhas shrunk by more than a third since 2007 and is still shrinking. Those participants left seem incapable of fixing the flaws that keep Wikipedia from becoming a high-quality encyclopedia by any standard, including the projects own. Among the significant problems that arent getting resolved is the sites skewed coverage: its entries on Pokemon and female porn stars are comprehensive, but its pages on female novelists or places in sub-Saharan Africa are sketchy. Authoritative entries remain elusive. Of the 1,000 articles that the projects own volunteers have tagged as forming the core of a good encyclopedia, most dont earn even Wikipedias own middle-?ranking quality scores.
|Toronto's Smallest House for Sale|
|Believe It Or Not: the World Has Actually Become a Better Place|
|Goodbye, Apostrophe: How the Apostrophe Will Slowly Fade Away from Language|
|Tradition of 'sworn virgins' dying out in Albania|
|How To Get Rich|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|“Bulgaria is hemorrhaging citizens at a rate of 164 per day.”|
|How to Make a Cheesecake that Looks Like Cheese|
|What Nothing Really Means in Seinfeld|
|“It's not more expensive to build and it's hugely cheaper and more efficient to live in.”|
|iPhone 6, the First Smartphone to Disrupt NSA's Spying|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|“How easy it is for anyone who tracks our digital activities to gain insight into our personalities.”|
|“Social media is the publisher, not just the postman.”|
|“A chain of endlessly recommended YouTube videos made by strangers motivated by advertising dollars.”|
|“Featuring over 2,000 flags in motion to Ludwig van Beethoven.”|