The Decline of Wikipedia

#Culture

Tue, Dec 3rd, 2013 21:00 by capnasty NEWS

On the MIT Technology Review, Tom Simonite explains how Wikipedia, with its shrinking volunteer workforce, is now mostly manned by a "90 percent male" loose collective which "operates a crushing bureaucracy with an often abrasive atmosphere", deterring newcomers from participating.

The sixth most widely used website in the world is not run anything like the others in the top 10. It is not operated by a sophisticated corporation but by a leaderless collection of volunteers who generally work under pseudonyms and habitually bicker with each other. It rarely tries new things in the hope of luring visitors; in fact, it has changed little in a decade. And yet every month 10 billion pages are viewed on the English version of Wikipedia alone. When a major news event takes place, such as the Boston Marathon bombings, complex, widely sourced entries spring up within hours and evolve by the minute. Because there is no other free information source like it, many online services rely on Wikipedia. Look something up on Google or ask Siri a question on your iPhone, and you’ll often get back tidbits of information pulled from the encyclopedia and delivered as straight-up facts.

Yet Wikipedia and its stated ambition to “compile the sum of all human knowledge” are in trouble. The volunteer workforce that built the project’s flagship, the English-language Wikipedia—and must defend it against vandalism, hoaxes, and manipulation—has shrunk by more than a third since 2007 and is still shrinking. Those participants left seem incapable of fixing the flaws that keep Wikipedia from becoming a high-quality encyclopedia by any standard, including the project’s own. Among the significant problems that aren’t getting resolved is the site’s skewed coverage: its entries on Pokemon and female porn stars are comprehensive, but its pages on female novelists or places in sub-Saharan Africa are sketchy. Authoritative entries remain elusive. Of the 1,000 articles that the project’s own volunteers have tagged as forming the core of a good encyclopedia, most don’t earn even Wikipedia’s own middle-?ranking quality scores.

  1057

 

You may also be interested in:

4 Ways Technology Can Enable Your Inner Introvert
Making Mark Twain Politically Correct #huckleberryfinn
Hipsters: "the way that we mark ourselves as members of a tribe"
Winamp's Third Party Skins
Why Men Won't Dance