On Democracy Now!, a fascinating look into Noam Chomsky's view on president's Obama announcing the delay in striking Syria. Chomsky amusingly brings to perspective the fact that the United States' threat of force is actually illegal.
The other things that [Obama] said were not unusual, but nevertheless kind of shocking to anyone not familiar with U.S. political discourse, at least. So he described the Unitedhe said that for seven decades the United States has been "the anchor of global security." Really? Seven decades? That includes, for example, just 40 years ago today, when the United States played a major role in overthrowing the parliamentary democracy of Chile and imposing a brutal dictatorship, called "the first 9/11" in Latin America. Go back earlier years, overthrowing the parliamentary system in Iran, imposing a dictatorship; same in Guatemala a year later; attacking Indochina, the worst crime in the postwar period, killing millions of people; attacking Central America; killinginvolved in killingin imposing a dictatorship in the Congo; and invading Iraqon and on. Thats stability? I mean, that a Harvard Law School graduate can pronounce those words is pretty amazing, as is the fact that theyre accepted without comment.
Russia's president Vladimir Putin agrees with this perspective of the United States as a rogue nation with his editorial in The New York Times:
From the outset, Russia has advocated peaceful dialogue enabling Syrians to develop a compromise plan for their own future. We are not protecting the Syrian government, but international law. We need to use the United Nations Security Council and believe that preserving law and order in today?s complex and turbulent world is one of the few ways to keep international relations from sliding into chaos. The law is still the law, and we must follow it whether we like it or not. Under current international law, force is permitted only in self-defense or by the decision of the Security Council. Anything else is unacceptable under the United Nations Charter and would constitute an act of aggression.
No one doubts that poison gas was used in Syria. But there is every reason to believe it was used not by the Syrian Army, but by opposition forces, to provoke intervention by their powerful foreign patrons, who would be siding with the fundamentalists. Reports that militants are preparing another attack -- this time against Israel -- cannot be ignored.
It is alarming that military intervention in internal conflicts in foreign countries has become commonplace for the United States. Is it in America?s long-term interest? I doubt it. Millions around the world increasingly see America not as a model of democracy but as relying solely on brute force, cobbling coalitions together under the slogan "you're either with us or against us."
Unsurprisingly, being told that 'Americans are not exceptional' was not liked by Americans.
|Five Stories on @Wikileaks' Archive Begging for Attention|
|Afghans Believe U.S. is Funding Taliban|
|News Peak: Toronto cities vote to hold nonbinding referenda|
|Half of the People in the Suspected Terrorist Database Are Not Connected to Any Known Terrorist Group|
|“They don’t drive like people. They drive like robots.”|
|“Parti.Vote is designed to make the US's representative government system more equitable.”|
|“They're usually these people that have been fucked by the system who are trying to unfuck themselves.”|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|Making a Movie Inside a Video Game|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|“If the facial data and related personal information is stolen and put on the internet, it will cause big problems.”|
|100 Things We Can Do Today to Stop Global Warming in the Next 30 Years|
|"It’s time for something so stupid it’s actually smart."|
|Google Map Shows You the Most Photographed Areas of the World|
|"Hours after the fires in Santa Rosa I filmed this postal worker still delivering the mail."|
|"Here is Home Depot's tape measure tutorial in all its glory."|