From the MIT Technology Review, Paul Ford looks at the strangeness of Facebook Home, noting that "Facebook’s new interface for smartphones is at odds with how the world uses computers."
No other company is like Facebook. It is an advertising-driven business that grows by routing more human social signals through its enormous proprietary network. As people use mobile devices to do more things, the company needs to capture more of smartphone users’ attention. Globally, people send 8.6 trillion text messages each year, and not through Facebook. Choosing not to limit itself to an app on smartphones, Facebook has built on Android, grafting onto it a new interface layer it calls Facebook Home.
It is an imperfect graft, and it may not take. One reason is the less-than-happy implementation of Facebook’s idea. But the broader problem is that the social-?networking company’s vision of the relationship between humans and computers is at odds with the Palo Alto tradition, which the world has irreversibly embraced. If there is a conflict between Facebook Home and the Android system on which it is built, it’s this: Android knows many small things, and Facebook Home knows only one big thing.
|Remembering the Time Before Cell Phones|
|"Almost everyone has a camera and is a photographer." In an Age of Likes, Commonplace Images Prevail|
|An Absence of Government Would Make the Tea Partiers Silly|
|WikiLeaks Is Good for the American Democracy|
|Americans Take Note on What Grown-Up News Look Like|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|Why, Typewriters Are Alive and Well, Thank you|
|On Building Your Own Trebuchet|
|Das Berliner Buchstabenmuseum|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|Bird Shit Advertising|
|Fall is Coming|
|Japanese Robot Serves Ice Cream From Inside a Vending Machine|
|Really boring books (You have to read anyway): Silmarillion|
|Really Boring Books (You Have to Read Anyway): Dead Aid, Dambisa Moyo.|