Cellphones Don’t Have Dial Tones to Put Less Strain on the Network


Wed, Apr 17th, 2013 20:00 by capnasty NEWS

Eric Limer of Gizmodo explains why mobile phones don't have a dial tone.

Meanwhile, Phil Porter, who had worked with [Richard] Frenkiel on the original system, came up with a permanent answer to an interesting question. Should a cellular phone have a dial tone? Porter made a radical suggestion that it shouldn't. A caller should dial a number and then push "send." That way, the mobile caller would be less rushed; also, the call would be connected for a shorter time, thus putting less strain on the network. That this idea—dial, then send—would later prove crucial to texting technology was not even considered.

Typing everything in and hitting enter may seem like second nature to us tech savvy folks, but it's weird to think that the change was actually an explicit choice, even a jarring on to older folks; phones like the Jitterbug still go out of their way to emulate a dial tone for old time's sake.



You may also be interested in:

When it Comes to Cellphone Costs, Canadians Are Getting Screwed the Most (RT @Mgeist)
What a Mobile Phone for Blind People Could Look Like
Everpurse: the Phone Charging Purse
Canada is a Telecom Backwater
“Do you really need all those features?”