Although a lucrative multi-million dollar business, according to The New Yorker's Gareth Cook, brain-training games don't actually make you smarter. They'll improve whatever "narrow task being trained" but won't make you better "at anything anyone might care about in real life."
Over the last year, however, the idea that working-memory training has broad benefits has crumbled. One group of psychologists, lead by a team at Georgia Tech, set out to replicate the Jaeggi findings, but with more careful controls and seventeen different cognitive-skills tests. Their subjects showed no evidence whatsoever for improvement in intelligence. They also identified a pattern of methodological problems with experiments showing positive results, like poor controls and a reliance on a single measure of cognitive improvement. This failed replication was recently published in one of psychologys top journals, and another, by a group at Case Western Reserve University, has been published since.
The recent meta-analysis, led by Monica Melby-Lervåg, of the University of Oslo, and also published in a top journal, is even more damning. Some studies are more convincing than others, because they include more subjects and show a larger effect. Melby-Lervågs paper laboriously accounts for this, incorporating what Jaeggi, Klingberg, and everyone else had reported. The meta-analysis found that the training isnt doing anyone much good. If anything, the scientific literature tends to overstate effects, because teams that find nothing tend not to publish their papers. (This is known as the filedrawer effect.) A null result from meta-analysis, published in a top journal, sends a shudder through the spine of all but the truest of believers. In the meantime, a separate paper by some of the Georgia Tech scientists looked specifically at Cogmeds training, which has been subjected to more scientific scrutiny than any other program. The claims made by Cogmed, they wrote, are largely unsubstantiated.
|"Blood from young mice reverses ageing in old mice."|
|Why 60 Seconds, 60 Minutes But 24 Hours?|
|Stephen Hawking Loses $100 Bet Over Whether the Higgs-Boson Actually Existed|
|"Creating an HIV vaccine is like trying to fire a gun at millions of shielded, moving targets that can eat your bullets." Why We Have No Cure for AIDS|
|The Geography of the Seven Deadly Sins|
|There Are Plastic Islands in the Pacific Ocean You Can Walk On|
|Renouncing U.S. Citizenship Fees Quadrupled|
|Children Are Learning that Siri, Not Their Parents, Is Most Readily Available to Answer Their Questions|
|For Back-to-School Teenagers, a New Phone Better Than New Clothes|
|Toronto's Fan Expo Canada|
|The Psychological Impact on the Daily Exposure to Bad News Reported by the Media|
|Somebody: Half-App, Half-Human|
|"One thing sits at the heart of what many consider a surveillance state within the US today."|
|Writing Ivy League Admission Essays for Wealthy Chinese|
|"Why fertilising the ocean with iron is not such a crazy idea."|
|Live Map of the War in Ukraine|
|Russians Want to Know if They Are at War|
|Why Guys Don't Call...|
|How Not to Buy a 3D Printer|
|Google's Drone Delivery Service|