Although a lucrative multi-million dollar business, according to The New Yorker's Gareth Cook, brain-training games don't actually make you smarter. They'll improve whatever "narrow task being trained" but won't make you better "at anything anyone might care about in real life."
Over the last year, however, the idea that working-memory training has broad benefits has crumbled. One group of psychologists, lead by a team at Georgia Tech, set out to replicate the Jaeggi findings, but with more careful controls and seventeen different cognitive-skills tests. Their subjects showed no evidence whatsoever for improvement in intelligence. They also identified a pattern of methodological problems with experiments showing positive results, like poor controls and a reliance on a single measure of cognitive improvement. This failed replication was recently published in one of psychologys top journals, and another, by a group at Case Western Reserve University, has been published since.
The recent meta-analysis, led by Monica Melby-Lervåg, of the University of Oslo, and also published in a top journal, is even more damning. Some studies are more convincing than others, because they include more subjects and show a larger effect. Melby-Lervågs paper laboriously accounts for this, incorporating what Jaeggi, Klingberg, and everyone else had reported. The meta-analysis found that the training isnt doing anyone much good. If anything, the scientific literature tends to overstate effects, because teams that find nothing tend not to publish their papers. (This is known as the filedrawer effect.) A null result from meta-analysis, published in a top journal, sends a shudder through the spine of all but the truest of believers. In the meantime, a separate paper by some of the Georgia Tech scientists looked specifically at Cogmeds training, which has been subjected to more scientific scrutiny than any other program. The claims made by Cogmed, they wrote, are largely unsubstantiated.
|Ten Facts About Diamonds|
|Earth-like planets as common as Starbucks|
|How Entanglement Could Be Deterministic|
|Giant iceberg spotted south of Australia|
|Water Bears: Microscopic Organism Capable of Surviving in the Vacuum of Space|
|TED-Ed Explains Why We Love Repetition in Music|
|Lithium is Good for You|
|The Schlörwagen: the Ultra Aerodynamic German Car from 1939|
|Using a Cancer Defence to Defeat It|
|Boeing and SpaceX Chosen by NASA|
|Star S'Mores, Sesame Street Parody of Star Wars|
|Complicated Machinery Recreated Entirely out of Wood|
|Crowd-Funded Space Program Successful|
|Eulogy to the iPod|
|"The idea is to get the robot to load your dishwasher."|
|Reducing the Half Life of Nuclear Waste from 100,000 to a Few Hundred Years|
|Scottish Referendum on Independence Explained|
|"There's like 30 knives out there right now, hidden up their rectums."|
|Why Starbucks Never Gets Your Name Right|
|Star Wars, Without Williams|