Although a lucrative multi-million dollar business, according to The New Yorker's Gareth Cook, brain-training games don't actually make you smarter. They'll improve whatever "narrow task being trained" but won't make you better "at anything anyone might care about in real life."
Over the last year, however, the idea that working-memory training has broad benefits has crumbled. One group of psychologists, lead by a team at Georgia Tech, set out to replicate the Jaeggi findings, but with more careful controls and seventeen different cognitive-skills tests. Their subjects showed no evidence whatsoever for improvement in intelligence. They also identified a pattern of methodological problems with experiments showing positive results, like poor controls and a reliance on a single measure of cognitive improvement. This failed replication was recently published in one of psychologys top journals, and another, by a group at Case Western Reserve University, has been published since.
The recent meta-analysis, led by Monica Melby-Lervåg, of the University of Oslo, and also published in a top journal, is even more damning. Some studies are more convincing than others, because they include more subjects and show a larger effect. Melby-Lervågs paper laboriously accounts for this, incorporating what Jaeggi, Klingberg, and everyone else had reported. The meta-analysis found that the training isnt doing anyone much good. If anything, the scientific literature tends to overstate effects, because teams that find nothing tend not to publish their papers. (This is known as the filedrawer effect.) A null result from meta-analysis, published in a top journal, sends a shudder through the spine of all but the truest of believers. In the meantime, a separate paper by some of the Georgia Tech scientists looked specifically at Cogmeds training, which has been subjected to more scientific scrutiny than any other program. The claims made by Cogmed, they wrote, are largely unsubstantiated.
|Single Injection Reverses Down Syndrome in Newborn Mice|
|Explain this one to the Creationists|
|Paul Revere's Midnight Ride Effect|
|End of the Odyssey|
|December Has the Longest Days of the Year|
|"Would we be forced, one day, to give machines rights?"|
|Documentary on Toronto's Subway at the End of the Service Day|
|"90% of British civil service workers have jobs so pointless, they could easily be replaced by robots."|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|"It's the equivalent of being able to see a grapefruit on the surface of the Moon."|
|“Mark Zuckerberg's manifesto [...] is a scary, dystopian document.”|
|"Renewable are no longer ‘alternative.’ Rather, fossil fuels are increasingly ‘legacy.’"|
|"It could help usher in a new cycle-centric transport paradigm across the country.”|
|"Robots with legs can go a lot of places that wheels cannot.”|
|"When it comes to growing intestines, the first inch is the hardest."|
|“The cost of carbon fibre could drop, dramatically and be seen in far more applications.”|