Why Gun Advocates Are Wrong


Tue, Dec 18th, 2012 10:00 by capnasty NEWS

In The American Prospect, Paul Waldman has put together a list of Ten Arguments Gun Advocates Make, and Why They're Wrong, in preparation for the debate Americans "ought to have." I particularly liked this one:

6. The Constitution says I have a right to own guns.

Yes it does, but for some reason gun advocates think that the right to bear arms is the only constitutional right that is virtually without limit. You have the right to practice your religion, but not if your religion involves human sacrifice. You have the right to free speech, but you can still be prosecuted for incitement or conspiracy, and you can be sued for libel. Every right is subject to limitation when it begins to threaten others, and the Supreme Court has affirmed that even though there is an individual right to gun ownership, the government can put reasonable restrictions on that right.

And we all know that if this shooter turns out to have a Muslim name, plenty of Americans, including plenty of gun owners, will be more than happy to give up all kinds of rights in the name of fighting terrorism. Have the government read my email? Have my cell phone company turn over my call records? Check which books I'm taking out of the library? Make me take my shoes off before getting on a plane, just because some idiot tried to blow up his sneakers? Sure, do what you've got to do. But don't make it harder to buy thousands of rounds of ammunition, because if we couldn't do that we'd no longer be free.



You may also be interested in:

In Defense of Hacking, Modding and Jailbreaking
That's Mister Fuck the Drug War to You
Hackers Condemning Hackers
"So you survived the apocalypse. Here's what would it take to rebuild the world."
How to Dismantle the American Empire Before This Country Goes Under