"I know only one person who loves working in Word: my 4-year-old."

Why Microsoft Word Must Die


Mon, Apr 16th, 2012 12:00 by capnasty NEWS

Slate's Tom Scocca has had it with Microsoft Word, a piece of software that gets more and more bloated as each version comes out. It constantly fills your screen with a plethora of options and "smart" features that do everything but make your life easier. "Microsoft Word is cumbersome, inefficient and obsolete," says Tom. "It's time for it to die."

Nearly two decades and several text-handling paradigms ago, I was an editorial assistant at a weekly newspaper, where a few freelancers still submitted their work on typewritten pages. Stories would come in over the fax machine. If the printout was clear enough, and if our giant flatbed scanner was in the mood, someone would scan the pages in, a text-recognition program would decipher the letters, and we would comb the resulting electronic file for nonsense and typos. If the scanner wasn't in the mood, we would prop up the hard copy beside a computer and retype the whole thing. Technology was changing fast, and some people were a few steps slow. You couldn't blame them, really, but for those of us who were fully in the computer age, those dead-tree sheets meant tedious extra work.

Nowadays, I get the same feeling of dread when I open an email to see a Microsoft Word document attached. Time and effort are about to be wasted cleaning up someone's archaic habits. A Word file is the story-fax of the early 21st century: cumbersome, inefficient, and a relic of obsolete assumptions about technology. It's time to give up on Word.

I stole the above image from Wikipedia's entry on Clippy.



You may also be interested in:

"Spies do not give their material to newspapers."
Watching the CBC do Itself In
"Google can answer almost anything you ask it, but it can't tell you what you ought to be asking."
"Suddenly, your news feed never disagrees with you."
The iPad is a Closed System, but the Kids are All Right