Musician Jonathan Coulton isn't denying that piracy is a big issue and that MegaUpload "were making a lot of money" from "the unauthorized download of other people's intellectual property". But while shutting down the service was all well and good, Jonathan asked himself: how much does piracy really hurt content creators (specifically, me)?"
As he explains:
Along with all the illegal stuff happening on MegaUpload was some amount of completely legal stuff. People used MegaUpload to send large files around. Some number of those files were personal files owned by the people sending them. I have no idea what the ratio was, and probably it would be impossible to figure that out with any certainty, but let's stipulate that it was a very large percentage of illegal activity, and only a very tiny percentage of the users were there for anything other than downloading content that they didn't buy. Still, today that tiny percentage had something taken away from them, without warning, maybe just a service they liked using, but maybe a piece of digital media that belonged to them - if they uploaded something and didn't keep a copy, that thing is now gone. Them's the breaks I guess, but in evaluating whether this shutdown was a net positive for us humans, you have to take that into account.
Even some of the illegal usage was likely the kind of activity that approaches what I consider to be victimless piracy: people downloading stuff they already bought but lost, people downloading stuff they missed on TV and couldn't find on Netflix or iTunes, people downloading stuff they didn't like and regretted watching or hearing and never would have bought anyway, people downloading a Jonathan Coulton album (oh let's say, Artificial Heart, the new Jonathan Coulton album, which is an awesome Jonathan Coulton album called Artificial Heart) and loving it so much that in a year they decide to buy a ticket to a Jonathan Coulton show and walk up to the merch table and hand me $20. I know not everyone will think all of those things are victimless crimes, and even I can admit that some of them maybe kinda sorta have victims, but my point is that you can't easily say that every illegal download is a lost sale, because it's a lot more complicated than that. So when you evaluate the "damage" that a site like MegaUpload is causing, you have to think about these things too. The grand jury indictment against them says they've caused $500 million in damages to copyright owners. Given the complexity of actual usage on a site like MegaUpload, how can they possibly know that?
|How Canadian Internet Users Are Getting Screwed (via @mgeist)|
|The Repercussions of Deleting Your Facebook Account|
|U.S. tests system to break foreign Web censorship|
|So, Why is #Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?|
|“How do you communicate wirelessly with WiFi using only plastic?”|
|“Tesla's Model S has outsold traditional high-end models from established European brands.”|
|The 24 Carrot Cake|
|“A modern trade route between Asia and Europe is under construction.”|
|Japanese Robot Serves Ice Cream From Inside a Vending Machine|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|“There are over a billion people who have no access to energy what-so-ever.”|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|“We estimate the dynamical lifetime of the Tesla to be a few tens of millions of years.”|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|“We are considering public transport free of charge in order to reduce the number of private cars.”|
|“What happens when anyone can make it appear as if anything has happened, regardless of whether or not it did?"|