In a collective sigh of relief for all bloggers in Canada, the Canadian Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that online publications cannot be found liable for linking to defamatory material -- as long as the linking itself is not defamatory.
From the Globe and Mail article on the ruling:
"Only when a hyperlinker presents content from the hyperlinked material in a way that actually repeats the defamatory content, should that content be considered 'published' by the hyperlinker."
"The court recognizes that simply posting a link to material that may be libellous is a far cry from publishing or repeating the libel, let alone endorsing what has been said in the linked post," he said.
|Race and Social Media|
|El Paquete Semanal: Cuba's Sneakernet|
|The YouTube Time Machine|
|Online Retailer Starts Charging Internet Explorer 7 Tax|
|Quit Facebook Day Falls Flat|
|“How do you communicate wirelessly with WiFi using only plastic?”|
|“Tesla's Model S has outsold traditional high-end models from established European brands.”|
|The 24 Carrot Cake|
|“A modern trade route between Asia and Europe is under construction.”|
|Japanese Robot Serves Ice Cream From Inside a Vending Machine|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|“There are over a billion people who have no access to energy what-so-ever.”|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|“We estimate the dynamical lifetime of the Tesla to be a few tens of millions of years.”|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|“We are considering public transport free of charge in order to reduce the number of private cars.”|
|“What happens when anyone can make it appear as if anything has happened, regardless of whether or not it did?"|