In Defense of Flogging


Wed, Apr 27th, 2011 21:00 by capnasty NEWS

Peter Moskos of The Chronicle thinks that the American prison system is broken and argues in favour for a return to corporal punishment:

If you were sentenced to five years in prison but had the option of receiving lashes instead, what would you choose? You would probably pick flogging. Wouldn't we all?

I propose we give convicts the choice of the lash at the rate of two lashes per year of incarceration. One cannot reasonably argue that merely offering this choice is somehow cruel, especially when the status quo of incarceration remains an option. Prison means losing a part of your life and everything you care for. Compared with this, flogging is just a few very painful strokes on the backside. And it's over in a few minutes. Often, and often very quickly, those who said flogging is too cruel to even consider suddenly say that flogging isn't cruel enough. Personally, I believe that literally ripping skin from the human body is cruel. Even Singapore limits the lash to 24 strokes out of concern for the criminal's survival. Now, flogging may be too harsh, or it may be too soft, but it really can't be both.



You may also be interested in:

"TED is a massive, money-soaked orgy of self-congratulatory futurism."
Tunisians Read WikiLeaks and Lose Their Shit
An Absence of Government Would Make the Tea Partiers Silly
"Google can answer almost anything you ask it, but it can't tell you what you ought to be asking."
Vuvuzelas Finally Banned -- by the UFC