Bizarre article on The Atlantic about a social-engineering study organized by Web Ecology Project. The goal, to determine if it was possible not only to infiltrate social networks, but also to influence them on a large scale by using social robots.
The group invited three teams to program "social bots" -- fake identities -- that could mimic human conversation on Twitter, and then picked 500 real users on the social network, the core of whom shared a fondness for cats. The Kiwis armed @JamesMTitus with a database of generic responses ("Oh, that's very interesting, tell me more about that") and designed it to systematically test parts of the network for what tweets generated the most responses, and then to talk to the most responsive people.
In the case of @JamesMTitus, the robot gained 109 followers in two weeks and all three robots had successfully insinuated themselves into the centre of the target network.
|"The [robot] could keep children [...] occupied for 'a couple of hours' without adult supervision."|
|“Robots should be fitted with an 'ethical black box' to keep track of their decisions.”|
|"Advances in sensor technology, computing and artificial intelligence are making human pilots less necessary than ever in the cockpit."|
|Huge LEGO Contraption to Sort Coloured Balls|
|“Social robots will be uniquely personal.”|
|“It knows the very contours of my face.”|
|“They created a dictatorship without mercy.”|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|If Sir David Attenborough Restored Vintage Toys|
|Fake Name Generator|
|“When Life Gives You Lemons.”|
|Pat the Zombie: A Cruel Adult Spoof of 'Pat the Bunny'|
|Recycled Vacuum Lamps|
|The Duck World|
|Darth Vader Surfing|