Bizarre article on The Atlantic about a social-engineering study organized by Web Ecology Project. The goal, to determine if it was possible not only to infiltrate social networks, but also to influence them on a large scale by using social robots.
The group invited three teams to program "social bots" -- fake identities -- that could mimic human conversation on Twitter, and then picked 500 real users on the social network, the core of whom shared a fondness for cats. The Kiwis armed @JamesMTitus with a database of generic responses ("Oh, that's very interesting, tell me more about that") and designed it to systematically test parts of the network for what tweets generated the most responses, and then to talk to the most responsive people.
In the case of @JamesMTitus, the robot gained 109 followers in two weeks and all three robots had successfully insinuated themselves into the centre of the target network.
|“Think 'Terminator riding on a hoverboard' and you’ll have a pretty good idea of the impression Handle gives off.”|
|"A handful of upper-assembling machines that can work at 20 times the pace of human workers."|
|Botlr, a Robotic Bellhop|
|How Robots With Broken Limbs Learn to Walk Again|
|"The creators were sent a photo of the vandalized robot but said they did not know who destroyed it or why."|
|“What life is like on the front lines of the digital revolution.”|
|“How to build a house.”|
|Japanese Robot Serves Ice Cream From Inside a Vending Machine|
|Humans Need Not Apply|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|A Really Fast Electric Skateboard|
|“It is full of hallucinations both wonderful and terrifying, a mental goulash of reality and fantasy.”|
|“Instead of consuming fossil fuels, it would then feed surplus electricity into the grid.”|
|Knowing how to operate a smartphone does not qualify as being tech savvy.|
|"Acting better than Star Trek deserves."|
|When the Wrong Hastag Can Get You Killed by an Assassination Drone|