Facebook and Twitter, notes Ashlee Vance and Miguel Helft in this article in the New York Times, have been perceived as outlets of "free speech". In a way, this is true: oppressive governments are finding it increasingly more difficult in trying to shut-up their citizens from voicing their concerns.
But one must not forget that Facebook and Twitter are, ultimately, corporations, more interested in the bottom line. This bottom line is provided by advertising. And advertisers will only advertise on places that they feel does not make their brand look bad.
"This leaves [Facebook and Twitter] with tough public relations and business decisions around how they should handle situations as politically charged as the WikiLeaks developments", and situations like WikiLeaks "highlights the complexities of free speech issues on the Internet, as grassroots Web companies evolve and take central control over what their users can make public."
|Wikipeetia: The Misspelled Encyclopedia|
|Prince Announces That the Internet is Over (RT: @SneakerF0X)|
|Blend Your Own Whiskey with Whisky Blender|
|Remember the Internet?|
|"A helpful guide created by an unqualified individual."|
|"An unabashed love letter to the 1982 motion picture Blade Runner."|
|Making a Movie Inside a Video Game|
|“Robots should be fitted with an 'ethical black box' to keep track of their decisions.”|
|“What if energy generation was a consumer electronic you could order off Amazon?”|
|"A real-time surveillance machine that has been developed for online advertising is rapidly expanding into other fields."|
|Fast, Clean, Cost-Effective Metal 3D-Printing|
|"You only need about 100 miles by 100 miles of solar panels to power the entire United States."|
|"State borders are a lot weirder than they first appear."|
|Google Map Shows You the Most Photographed Areas of the World|
|"Warp drives could become a real technology within the lifetimes of today’s toddlers."|