Facebook and Twitter, notes Ashlee Vance and Miguel Helft in this article in the New York Times, have been perceived as outlets of "free speech". In a way, this is true: oppressive governments are finding it increasingly more difficult in trying to shut-up their citizens from voicing their concerns.
But one must not forget that Facebook and Twitter are, ultimately, corporations, more interested in the bottom line. This bottom line is provided by advertising. And advertisers will only advertise on places that they feel does not make their brand look bad.
"This leaves [Facebook and Twitter] with tough public relations and business decisions around how they should handle situations as politically charged as the WikiLeaks developments", and situations like WikiLeaks "highlights the complexities of free speech issues on the Internet, as grassroots Web companies evolve and take central control over what their users can make public."
|Lorem Pixel: Placeholder Images for Every Case|
|Hot Chicks in Batman Shirts|
|Indians not allowed to surf for porn|
|Scrollorama: jQuery Plugin for Doing Cool Scrolly Stuff|
|The Wired World|
|“We estimate the dynamical lifetime of the Tesla to be a few tens of millions of years.”|
|“Facebook is a declining power.”|
|The 24 Carrot Cake|
|“There are over a billion people who have no access to energy what-so-ever.”|
|Japanese Robot Serves Ice Cream From Inside a Vending Machine|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|"What if plant cells could be grown for food by regular people."|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|"Automation will disrupt millions of Canadian jobs, not far in the future, but in the next dozen years."|
|“What happens when anyone can make it appear as if anything has happened, regardless of whether or not it did?"|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|“Can a platform be 'cool' if your aunt, grandfather, and third grade teacher all use it?”|