Facebook and Twitter, notes Ashlee Vance and Miguel Helft in this article in the New York Times, have been perceived as outlets of "free speech". In a way, this is true: oppressive governments are finding it increasingly more difficult in trying to shut-up their citizens from voicing their concerns.
But one must not forget that Facebook and Twitter are, ultimately, corporations, more interested in the bottom line. This bottom line is provided by advertising. And advertisers will only advertise on places that they feel does not make their brand look bad.
"This leaves [Facebook and Twitter] with tough public relations and business decisions around how they should handle situations as politically charged as the WikiLeaks developments", and situations like WikiLeaks "highlights the complexities of free speech issues on the Internet, as grassroots Web companies evolve and take central control over what their users can make public."
|Craiggers: Giving Craiglist a Nice User Interface|
|Surf Facebook With the Oculus Rift|
|The NSA Prism Whisteblower: Everything You Need to Know|
|The Twitter Times generates a newspaper from your account|
|Five Billionth Device About to Plug into Internet|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|Why, Typewriters Are Alive and Well, Thank you|
|On Building Your Own Trebuchet|
|Das Berliner Buchstabenmuseum|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|Bird Shit Advertising|
|Fall is Coming|
|Japanese Robot Serves Ice Cream From Inside a Vending Machine|
|Really boring books (You have to read anyway): Silmarillion|
|Really Boring Books (You Have to Read Anyway): Dead Aid, Dambisa Moyo.|