Facebook and Twitter, notes Ashlee Vance and Miguel Helft in this article in the New York Times, have been perceived as outlets of "free speech". In a way, this is true: oppressive governments are finding it increasingly more difficult in trying to shut-up their citizens from voicing their concerns.
But one must not forget that Facebook and Twitter are, ultimately, corporations, more interested in the bottom line. This bottom line is provided by advertising. And advertisers will only advertise on places that they feel does not make their brand look bad.
"This leaves [Facebook and Twitter] with tough public relations and business decisions around how they should handle situations as politically charged as the WikiLeaks developments", and situations like WikiLeaks "highlights the complexities of free speech issues on the Internet, as grassroots Web companies evolve and take central control over what their users can make public."
|A Minimal, Wireframing Tool|
|Are You a Human: Stop Spam With Fun|
|Facebook: What is Private?|
|''When do we get scared about what Facebook could do with its power?''|
|Rivals bid to snatch green domain|
|Fake Name Generator|
|“A machine meant to hurl rockets into space.”|
|“The only thing worse than assuming that carbon removal will save the day is assuming it will save the day.”|
|Japanese Robot Serves Ice Cream From Inside a Vending Machine|
|“Are the puppets coming for our jobs?”|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|What Computers See When They Watch a Movie|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|Chinese warehouse organises, packs, and fulfills 200,000 orders a day with four people|
|David Reeves' Paper Cutouts Inspired by Classic Cult Movies|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|Recycled Vacuum Lamps|