LifeHacker looks at a recent post by Facebook in which it acknowledges that using Facebook is bad for you — I'm guessing seeing other people's carefully curated feed posts of their perfect lives causes depression when comparing your non-perfect existence to them. Unsurprisingly, Facebook is not suggesting using social media less.
You can read the whole post by the Facebook researchers and never see any question about how much Facebook is an appropriate amount of Facebook. That’s not the question they want to answer, because the answer is probably “less.” Instead, they ask questions like:
* How can we make people happier with reading their news feeds?
* How can Facebook “support [teens] as they transition through different stages of life”?
Maybe a good conclusion at this point would be stop giving people incentives to scroll through their feed.
|"It's the first time electrical stimulation directly to the spinal cord has shown voluntary activity."|
|After Success in Mice, Ant-Ageing Compound Set for Human Trials|
|“If there’s any kind of future for 'designer babies', it might look something like this.”|
|Software Predicted Ebola Outbreak Before It Was Announced|
|"Swimming nanorobots that deliver drugs where they’re needed."|
|“A low flyover of Jupiter's moon Europa.”|
|“A sophisticated global marketing strategy from an industry that is desperate to attract new smokers.”|
|U.S.S. Enterprise Owner's Manual|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|“If you’re dating, you’re going to be let down. You’re not going to be everyone’s cup of tea.”|
|“The Amazon Dash button for horny men and women who don’t feel comfortable telling their partner they’d like to have sex.”|
|Recycled Vacuum Lamps|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|iPhone 6, the First Smartphone to Disrupt NSA's Spying|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|“When Life Gives You Lemons.”|
|“How this religious holiday became the rampant, love-fuelled corp-fest.”|