LifeHacker looks at a recent post by Facebook in which it acknowledges that using Facebook is bad for you — I'm guessing seeing other people's carefully curated feed posts of their perfect lives causes depression when comparing your non-perfect existence to them. Unsurprisingly, Facebook is not suggesting using social media less.
You can read the whole post by the Facebook researchers and never see any question about how much Facebook is an appropriate amount of Facebook. That’s not the question they want to answer, because the answer is probably “less.” Instead, they ask questions like:
* How can we make people happier with reading their news feeds?
* How can Facebook “support [teens] as they transition through different stages of life”?
Maybe a good conclusion at this point would be stop giving people incentives to scroll through their feed.
|"It's the first time electrical stimulation directly to the spinal cord has shown voluntary activity."|
|How Toilet Paper is Made|
|Williams Syndrome: the Opposite of Autism|
|Neutral, Unbranded Cigaratte Packages May Encourage Smokers to Quit|
|"It’s time to kill all the mosquitoes. It’s time for mass mosquito-cide."|
|“I can’t wait for the day robots rule.”|
|“Changes to the platform announced by Zuckerberg, will likely make the problem worse.”|
|“AI codes its own ‘AI Child’.”|
|Pat the Zombie: A Cruel Adult Spoof of 'Pat the Bunny'|
|“The first-ever driverless mass transit test program.”|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|“The e-Palette, a vehicle that may one day not only deliver, but cook Pizza Hut offerings en route.”|
|How to Escape Planet Earth|
|“Scientific evidence that digital distraction is damaging our minds.”|
|“Imagine if you were allowed to eat as many M&M’s as you wanted.”|
|“Some of us will do anything to be liked.”|
|“The idea is to extract value from customers in the name of absurd growth.”|