LifeHacker looks at a recent post by Facebook in which it acknowledges that using Facebook is bad for you — I'm guessing seeing other people's carefully curated feed posts of their perfect lives causes depression when comparing your non-perfect existence to them. Unsurprisingly, Facebook is not suggesting using social media less.
You can read the whole post by the Facebook researchers and never see any question about how much Facebook is an appropriate amount of Facebook. That’s not the question they want to answer, because the answer is probably “less.” Instead, they ask questions like:
* How can we make people happier with reading their news feeds?
* How can Facebook “support [teens] as they transition through different stages of life”?
Maybe a good conclusion at this point would be stop giving people incentives to scroll through their feed.
|Apple Wants Your DNA|
|The Day Her Vagina Fell Out|
|"People can pay $8,000 to have their veins pumped with blood plasma from teenagers."|
|Cure for Ebola Outbreak Appears to Have Been Found|
|"Recent research suggests that aging may actually be a modifiable risk factor."|
|“Seen from the inside, its Chrome browser looks a lot like surveillance software.”|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|“Working less is good for the environment.”|
|“I don't know if this is going to be the smartest or the stupidest thing I'm ever gonna do.”|
|“Airbus says his company already has the technology to fly passenger planes without pilots at all.”|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|“My son died here.”|
|Recycled Vacuum Lamps|
|“Canada is warming at twice the global average.”|
|Fake Name Generator|
|If Sir David Attenborough Restored Vintage Toys|