With trust in politicians declining, Fran Mols and Jonathan Roberts from the University of Queensland, propose replacing government representatives with machine code. While this wouldn't resolve some moral or ethical issues, it may cut down on red tape, costs, and influence. The Watson 2016 Foundation had already proposed IBM's Watson to be the next U.S. president.
So even if we had a parliament full of robots, we would still need an agency staffed by humans charged with defining the ethical standards to be programmed into the robots.
And who gets to decide on those ethical standards? Well we’d probably have to put that to the vote between various interested and competing parties.
This bring us full circle, back to the problem of how to prevent undue influence.
|Why are there so many names on the U.S. government's terrorist list?|
|Shit Harper Did|
|“A modern trade route between Asia and Europe is under construction.”|
|"The Second Amendment has been the subject of one of the greatest pieces of fraud on the American public."|
|“It’s taking orders for a real-life flying motorcycle powered by five modified jet engines.”|
|“By day, she visits morgues, observes autopsies, and studies pictures of crime scenes.”|
|What Nothing Really Means in Seinfeld|
|U.S.S. Enterprise Owner's Manual|
|“Featuring over 2,000 flags in motion to Ludwig van Beethoven.”|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|Fake Name Generator|
|“Without ads, how does Netflix manage to make money?”|
|If Sir David Attenborough Restored Vintage Toys|
|“A chain of endlessly recommended YouTube videos made by strangers motivated by advertising dollars.”|