With trust in politicians declining, Fran Mols and Jonathan Roberts from the University of Queensland, propose replacing government representatives with machine code. While this wouldn't resolve some moral or ethical issues, it may cut down on red tape, costs, and influence. The Watson 2016 Foundation had already proposed IBM's Watson to be the next U.S. president.
So even if we had a parliament full of robots, we would still need an agency staffed by humans charged with defining the ethical standards to be programmed into the robots.
And who gets to decide on those ethical standards? Well we’d probably have to put that to the vote between various interested and competing parties.
This bring us full circle, back to the problem of how to prevent undue influence.
|Fly With Dignity: Stop the TSA|
|Parliament blocks Arab parties from contesting general election|
|Stephen Harper Eats Babies|
|A Nation of None and All of the Above|
|“From sand to soil in 7 hours.”|
|“If you could decide today... how long do you want to live?”|
|“We have an opportunity, to fundamentally redefine what urban life can actually be.”|
|“They're usually these people that have been fucked by the system who are trying to unfuck themselves.”|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|“Parti.Vote is designed to make the US's representative government system more equitable.”|
|A Bicycle with No Pedals You Run With|
|Google Map Shows You the Most Photographed Areas of the World|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|“As users, it’s important to be aware of how the platform is manipulating you.”|
|Watson 2016 #thinkwatson|