"The early versions of the Terminator are already here."

Replacing soldiers with robots

#War

Fri, Oct 7th, 2016 11:00 by capnasty NEWS

With autonomous robotic systems already deployed on warships, in the air, and along borders, the Washington Post notes that not only are "the early versions of the Terminator [...] already here" but that there are "no global conventions limiting their use." The article argues that we are not ready for "Robocops policing our cities".

The rationale then will be that if we can send a robot instead of a human into war, we are morally obliged to do so, because it will save lives — at least, our soldiers’ lives, and in the short term. And it is likely that robots will be better at applying the most straightforward laws of war than humans have proven to be. You wouldn’t have the My Lai massacre of the Vietnam War if robots could enforce basic rules, such as “don’t shoot women and children.” And then there will be questions of chain of command. Who is accountable in the event that something goes wrong? If a weapons system has a design or manufacturing issue, the manufacturer can be held accountable. If a system was deployed when it should not have been deployed, all commanders going up the chain are responsible. Ascribing responsibility will still be a challenging task, as it is with conventional weapons, but the more important question is: Should the decision to take a human life be made by a machine?

  584

 

You may also be interested in:

World Peace is Closer Than You Think
Inflatable Weapons of Mass Destruction
Snipers of the Taliban
Film Industry Hires Cyber Hitmen To Take Down Internet Pirates
"It was a suicide mission. None of them had a doubt about that."