On The Guardian, Julia Carrie Wong looks at the iPal, a child-sized robot designed to keep children occupied "for hours without supervision," raising ethical questions about abandoning children in front of the device.
“It’s a robot for children,” said Avatar Mind founder Jiping Wang. “It’s mainly for companionship.” The iPal, he boasted, could keep children aged three to eight occupied for “a couple of hours” without adult supervision. It is perfect for the time when children arrive home from school a few hours before their parents get off work, he said.
The iPal takes the debate over the automation of human jobs to the next level. The ethics of how robots should interact with children is necessarily more fraught than the ethics of robots in the workforce. Childcare has rarely, if ever, been a particularly well-remunerated or respected job, but it is essential.
|The Droid You're Looking For|
|“A robot whose sole purpose in life is to fold your laundry.”|
|Boston Dynamics' Spot|
|The Heathkit Hero Robots|
|Wearable Collaborative Robot|
|“An ingenious con to squeeze everyone for more money through recurring subscription fees from multiple streaming services.”|
|“We are undergoing the greatest economic transformation in our history, and we are dealing with it by pretending nothing is happening.”|
|“No one is coming to save us.”|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|“The golden age of YouTube [...] is over.”|
|What Nothing Really Means in Seinfeld|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|Recycled Vacuum Lamps|
|“Reality might be a video game.”|
|If Sir David Attenborough Restored Vintage Toys|