"The banks are going to discover—the hard way—that getting into bed with Apple was a bad idea."

What Apple VS the FBI is all about


Tue, Mar 29th, 2016 11:00 by capnasty NEWS

On Charlie's Diary, Charlie Stross explains that the Apple VS. the FBI spectacle is not about a corporate giant suddenly caring about consumer privacy and civil rights, but entirely about money.

Ultimately the banks are going to discover—the hard way—that getting into bed with Apple was a bad idea, about the same way that getting into bed with Amazon over ebooks was a bad idea for the Big Five publishers. Apple is de facto an investment bank, right now: all it needs is a banking license and the right back end and regulatory oversight and risk management and it will be able to go toe-to-toe with the likes of Chase or Barclays or HSBC as a consumer bank, too. And Apple has a very good idea of how risky their customers' behavior is because unlike the banks and the credit card settlement network they're not running on incrementally upgraded legacy infrastructure designed in the 1950s. Note those two words a couple of sentences ago: "risk management". Banks are not in the business of holding your money or making loans; they live or die by how well they manage risk. Apple, like Google, has a much richer relationship with their customers than any bank. They can (for example), with a customer's position, know roughly where the customer's phone or watch is moving, and thereby spot faked payment credentials if someone clones the device and tries to use it to buy something a thousand miles away. The CC networks have velocity checking but it's a really crude metric for spotting fraud: Apple can massively improve on it.



You may also be interested in:

Insanely Priced Roaming Fees? That's Just Your Mobile Company Scamming You
How Much it Costs to Be Batman
The United States Should Sell Alaska to Solve Its Debt Problems
IBM and Microsoft Just Killed the Patent Reform
The Last 2,000 Years of the World's Economies Shown in One Simple Graph