"Robots don’t respect the social and moral niceties that humans are socialized to observe."

Robots need ethics


Wed, Sep 2nd, 2015 11:00 by capnasty NEWS

With the possibility of robots becoming more and more common, sporting an ever more sophisticated artificial intelligence, and having the ability to perform tasks without supervision, Jerry Kaplan of Humans Need Not Apply fame explains the importance of giving them a moral code to abide to — especially if we start treating them as if they were alive.

I’m actually working on a project on this at Stanford. I don’t want robots pushing ladies off the sidewalk as they’re moving, that’s bad. And so that’s a design problem. The sidewalk isn’t designed for robots. We need to program the robot so that it would obey social conventions and give priority to people, and are able to deal with moral challenges. Not too many people in the field of robot building are thinking about or worrying about this issue.

Think of it in terms of people and animals. Animals will take actions independent of their owners and you have a certain level of responsibility to control that animal but it is not as absolute as you might think. Your dog can go bite somebody and your liability is limited to certain kinds of things. They actually have a legal term for this now, it’s called the first bite theory. Once it has bitten somebody, now you are liable if it takes a second bite.



You may also be interested in:

"Would we be forced, one day, to give machines rights?"
Randomized Consumerism: Darius Kazemi's Bot That Buys Him Random Crap from Amazon
"Gathering human perspective on moral decision made by machine intelligence."
Betty, the Robot Manager
Are You Following a Bot on Twitter?