In response to intelligence agencies claiming that internet companies are a "safe haven for terrorists" because they do not identify and report threats, TechFruit counter argues that unless a warrant is provided, social media sites should not be expected to spy on their users.
[...] before any criminal or terrorist act has been committed, neither Facebook nor any other communications company should be actively monitoring any users unless issued with a judge-sanctioned warrant. If the police or intelligence services are unable to obtain a warrant because their evidence is too speculative, then it is certainly not for private companies to spy on their users.
The intelligence agencies generally do a good job of protecting the British public from terror attacks, and their actions in doing so should be commended – but when they have an intelligence failure, as in the case of Rigby’s murder, then they should accept the blame. [...]
|How the Police Monitor Tweets in Real Time|
|Be Seen and Unseen With Privacy Glasses|
|Snowden's Online Privacy 101|
|Signal: Free, Worldwide, Encrypted Phone Calls for iPhone|
|"Anything that you’re doing on your phone, Facebook is watching."|
|"There needs to be more aggressive enforcement action on tech companies like Google."|
|“Not a single personal insult was uttered by any member of the crew.”|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|Making a Movie Inside a Video Game|
|"Cells have the capacity to process and respond to instructions and codes inputted into their main system."|
|“Clicking on a Facebook advert may reveal things about yourself you don’t want anyone to know.”|
|Google Map Shows You the Most Photographed Areas of the World|
|“Instead of consuming fossil fuels, it would then feed surplus electricity into the grid.”|