According to Mother Jones, scientists are being sceptical of the recent announcement from Lockheed Martin, promising fusion reactors in as little as a decade, because it "is all theoretical at this stage."
[...]The challenge, essentially, is putting the sun in a box. That box, in theory, is packed full of charged particles, moving at great speeds, constrained by a strong magnetic field that enhances the probability that the particles slam into each other. With enough pressure, the particles stop resisting, and finally fuse, let off an amazing amount of energy.
The problem, says Reed, is that usually it takes just as much energy to power that controlling magnetic field as the power you get from fusion, hence the current size of the reactors. Lockheed claims to be able to harness that energy at a more efficient rate, so it can then make the reactors smaller.
|The Scale of the Universe: Cary Huang's Interactive Site Puts Big and Small Into Perspective|
|“First confirmed case of the gene editing of human embryos in the US.”|
|The Only Roadblock to a Head Transplant Is Ethics, Not Science|
|Maybe the Math Behind String Theory Is Overrated Anyway|
|How To Lose the Most Amount of Weight With the Least Amount of Work|
|Fake Name Generator|
|“A machine meant to hurl rockets into space.”|
|“The only thing worse than assuming that carbon removal will save the day is assuming it will save the day.”|
|Japanese Robot Serves Ice Cream From Inside a Vending Machine|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|“Are the puppets coming for our jobs?”|
|Chinese warehouse organises, packs, and fulfills 200,000 orders a day with four people|
|What Computers See When They Watch a Movie|
|Recycled Vacuum Lamps|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|David Reeves' Paper Cutouts Inspired by Classic Cult Movies|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|