According to Mother Jones, scientists are being sceptical of the recent announcement from Lockheed Martin, promising fusion reactors in as little as a decade, because it "is all theoretical at this stage."
[...]The challenge, essentially, is putting the sun in a box. That box, in theory, is packed full of charged particles, moving at great speeds, constrained by a strong magnetic field that enhances the probability that the particles slam into each other. With enough pressure, the particles stop resisting, and finally fuse, let off an amazing amount of energy.
The problem, says Reed, is that usually it takes just as much energy to power that controlling magnetic field as the power you get from fusion, hence the current size of the reactors. Lockheed claims to be able to harness that energy at a more efficient rate, so it can then make the reactors smaller.
|How To Make a Pet Dinosaur|
|Short Animation Explains DNA|
|"It is literally a programming language for bacteria."|
|MIT: Tinfoil Hats Not That Good at Stopping Mind Control Rays|
|Adam Savage: How Simple Ideas Lead to Scientific Discoveries|
|“What jobs will be created and what jobs will disappear?”|
|Gira Lab Universal Timer|
|Japanese Robot Serves Ice Cream From Inside a Vending Machine|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|“Long live the instant gratification economy—and the increasingly sophisticated technology that’s enabling it.”|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|Boston Dynamics' Robot does Parkour|
|“Computer algorithms increasingly control and decide our future.”|
|Why, Typewriters Are Alive and Well, Thank you|
|“Robots are key to a new wave of local agriculture.”|
|“Authoritarianism depends upon people getting used to hearing the things that they want to hear.”|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|