While the issues of ethics with autonomous cars are nothing new, now that Google's self-driving car is tackling cities, a new question has come up: should a self-driving car faced with no other option but to crash into something (or someone), collide with the object that will cause the least amount of harm overall?
In the name of crash-optimization, you should program the car to crash into whatever can best survive the collision. In the last scenario, that meant smashing into the Volvo SUV. Here, it means striking the motorcyclist who’s wearing a helmet. A good algorithm would account for the much-higher statistical odds that the biker without a helmet would die, and surely killing someone is one of the worst things auto manufacturers desperately want to avoid.
But we can quickly see the injustice of this choice, as reasonable as it may be from a crash-optimization standpoint. By deliberately crashing into that motorcyclist, we are in effect penalizing him or her for being responsible, for wearing a helmet. Meanwhile, we are giving the other motorcyclist a free pass, even though that person is much less responsible for not wearing a helmet, which is illegal in most U.S. states.
Not only does this discrimination seem unethical, but it could also be bad policy. That crash-optimization design may encourage some motorcyclists to not wear helmets, in order to not stand out as favored targets of autonomous cars, especially if those cars become more prevalent on the road. Likewise, in the previous scenario, sales of automotive brands known for safety may suffer, such as Volvo and Mercedes Benz, if customers want to avoid being the robot car’s target of choice.
|"Those old Model Ts were still pretty complicated to drive."|
|"You can regularly find two to three hour flights on budget airlines for less than 10 euros."|
|The Fliege/Supergiro Gyrocopter Concept|
|Why Does it Take so Long to Mend an Escalator?|
|The Killer Downside of Warp Drive Engines|
|How to Escape Planet Earth|
|“The first-ever driverless mass transit test program.”|
|“I can’t wait for the day robots rule.”|
|Pat the Zombie: A Cruel Adult Spoof of 'Pat the Bunny'|
|Study Suggests Students Addicted to the Internet|
|Shuttle Discovery's Final Flight|
|"Searching Ferguson on Twitter not only yields results of speculations about the truth, but the truth itself."|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|“Some of us will do anything to be liked.”|
|“The e-Palette, a vehicle that may one day not only deliver, but cook Pizza Hut offerings en route.”|
|“Automation doesn't have to be a replacement for human workers.”|
|“Scientific evidence that digital distraction is damaging our minds.”|