While the issues of ethics with autonomous cars are nothing new, now that Google's self-driving car is tackling cities, a new question has come up: should a self-driving car faced with no other option but to crash into something (or someone), collide with the object that will cause the least amount of harm overall?
In the name of crash-optimization, you should program the car to crash into whatever can best survive the collision. In the last scenario, that meant smashing into the Volvo SUV. Here, it means striking the motorcyclist who’s wearing a helmet. A good algorithm would account for the much-higher statistical odds that the biker without a helmet would die, and surely killing someone is one of the worst things auto manufacturers desperately want to avoid.
But we can quickly see the injustice of this choice, as reasonable as it may be from a crash-optimization standpoint. By deliberately crashing into that motorcyclist, we are in effect penalizing him or her for being responsible, for wearing a helmet. Meanwhile, we are giving the other motorcyclist a free pass, even though that person is much less responsible for not wearing a helmet, which is illegal in most U.S. states.
Not only does this discrimination seem unethical, but it could also be bad policy. That crash-optimization design may encourage some motorcyclists to not wear helmets, in order to not stand out as favored targets of autonomous cars, especially if those cars become more prevalent on the road. Likewise, in the previous scenario, sales of automotive brands known for safety may suffer, such as Volvo and Mercedes Benz, if customers want to avoid being the robot car’s target of choice.
|GOOD's Infographic: Where Youth Would Like to Move|
|@flykly: Ultra-Thin and Highly Efficient Pedal Assist Motor for Your Bicycle|
|So You Want to Go and Teach in Japan|
|Vasily: Retired Russian Farmer Leaves His Village for the First Time to See the World|
|You Can Travel Through Paris Almost Completely Underground|
|“Facebook played a 'determining role' in stirring up hatred against Rohingya Muslims.”|
|3D Printed $10,000 House|
|“The Pentagon’s relatively quiet tip-toe into converting the U.S. Armed Forces to a machine-majority force.”|
|Future Horizon's Plasma Lightsabers|
|Japanese Robot Serves Ice Cream From Inside a Vending Machine|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|“New green policies so hard-hitting and extensive they can be felt across the world.”|
|“Clearly, no one is going to build weapons that have sufficient general intelligence to, for example, decide and execute a plan to take over the world.”|
|“Contains all the same components as cow’s milk, [...] but doesn’t use any animals in its production process.”|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|“Traditional path to economic growth may close to all but a handful of developing countries.”|
|“I am a philosopher, and we tend to deal more with nightmares.”|