According to E.O. Wilson of The Wall Street Journal, the real success behind a scientist's discoveries come from ideas, not number crunching.
This imbalance is especially the case in biology, where factors in a real-life phenomenon are often misunderstood or never noticed in the first place. The annals of theoretical biology are clogged with mathematical models that either can be safely ignored or, when tested, fail. Possibly no more than 10% have any lasting value. Only those linked solidly to knowledge of real living systems have much chance of being used.
If your level of mathematical competence is low, plan to raise it, but meanwhile, know that you can do outstanding scientific work with what you have. Think twice, though, about specializing in fields that require a close alternation of experiment and quantitative analysis. These include most of physics and chemistry, as well as a few specialties in molecular biology.
Newton invented calculus in order to give substance to his imagination. Darwin had little or no mathematical ability, but with the masses of information he had accumulated, he was able to conceive a process to which mathematics was later applied.
|03-09||What War For Children Is Like, a Second a Day For a Year|
|03-07||Lammily: a Barbie-Like Doll With Average Body Size|
|02-26||Turn Your Smartphone into a Gameboy|
|02-27||Cloudwash: Internet Connected Washing Machine|
|03-02||Spritz: Lets You Read 500wpm+ With Surprising Ease|
|03-08||Mini-Documentary on Those Who Will Be Taking a One-Way Trip to Mars|
|02-28||Li Hongbo's "Statues in Motion"|
|03-07||Study: Facebook Use Linked to Eating Disorders and Body Dissatisfaction Among Women|
|02-25||America Has Worse Inequality Than That Portrayed in 'Downton Abbey'|
|02-27||Space Elevators: "totally feasible and a really smart idea."|