The dangers of poorly trained humans
Capital of Nasty Electronic Magazine
Monday, February 17, 2003 (590/106)
ISSN 1482-0471
By Tim King
In an ideal world a human being is raised to realize the value external factors that contribute to their existence. Any child by the time it can interact with its world in a meaningful way would have a profound respect for the processes that go on around them making their lives easier. They would also have a deep appreciation for the natural world and their place in it including (of course) the part other human animals play in their development. Through an appreciation of these relationships the human being develops empathy and a realistic understanding of the world and their place in it.
Unfortunately the vast majority of people nowadays are not given an appreciation of anything other than television at an early age. Desensitized to the subtleties of natural interaction by a flood of abstract images and ideas that in no way teach them of the world around them, these children grew up less than feral. A feral child has a profound understanding of consequence and the difficulty involved in simply surviving. Fat, modern children are drunk on media that portraits a kind of mythic heroism that validates violence in all situations and encourages the devaluation of their fellows in favour of a distended, completely unrealistic sense of self aggrandizement. The feral child would have realistic values in a thousand ways that the finger twitching, playstation playing, bloated, inhuman creature staring blankly at the screen doesn't.
So one of these modern wonders appears in the suddenly very public class room with virtually no human interaction skills and no sense of anything beyond some media warped belief in their own invulnerability. Soon enough problems between the child, his peers and his teachers flare up and he is labelled and put in special classes where less is expected of him. You can hardly blame the system for doing this. If his own caregivers don't give a damn about raising him, why should a publicly funded training system?
Given such a piece of work what is an instructor to do? Like any other animal that has been mistreated, this child needs strict guidelines, consistency in training and virtually no opportunity to act under its own cognition - at least until it is able to develop a series of associations that at least resemble the real world. A child that believes they can do anything they wish without consequence is as much a danger to himself as he is to others. Consequence is a vital lesson in developing a child's world view and a very central idea in how human beings exist in reality. This mistreated child with wildly abstract and unrealistic understandings has to be taught socially acceptable, safe behaviour before they become a threat to themselves and others. Consistent restructuring of these fundamental beliefs is possible, but it isn't easy, and it is never a perfect fix. Compared to the cost of doing it right in the first place repairing damaged development children is always an expensive proposition. Like any other mistreated animal, no matter how intense and well put together the training is to repair this damage, there will always be an element of chaotic selfishness in their psyche and given an opportunity to exercise it they will.
In a world where there are more human beings than we know what to do with and many more are raised with little or no effort it is amazing that we value them like we do. Since money is our means of value, why is no monetary value assigned to parenting and the results of it? If we were really serious about Capitalism we could easily implement such a system and it would clarify the confusion many parents seem to have in juggling financial wants with parental responsibilities. Imagine a schooling system in which a student's poor behaviour has immediate financial repercussions on his caregivers. No longer would the student alone be responsible for his actions. That detention after school would be followed up with a $50 fine sent home to the parents. Imagine a teacher noticing abuse in a child. In addition to legal punishments a $10,000 fine appears in the mail. Imagine a child who integrates well with his peers and gets good marks; an additional $5000 back on his parent's next tax return. I imagine any confusion about parenting vs. financial wants would be cleared up in a matter of moments.
In a perfect world children are raised in a communal atmosphere of support and trust, where they are free to explore for themselves when they are ready and always have a guiding hand available when they are not. Such children would grow into themselves as individuals, understanding and minimizing their weaknesses while developing their strengths to best effect. Self knowledge would be an inherent part of their makeup and that self knowledge would include an appreciation for the work that those who came before them put into their development.
The effect of one child raised poorly in that perfect world would be terrible. Children learn much of their world view from one another. A child who bullies and demands based on ill-taught wishes of personal embellishment and violence is a dangerous creature who can easily lead other children without that background or proclivity to the lazy path of selfishness. This is precisely why children are incapable of raising themselves: they have yet to learn the complexity of what allows them to live as they do. If ignorance teaches ignorance it will flourish.
Comments
6 comments found
| [prev] { } | Surf Director [next] |







I don't get it. Does anyone understand what this article is about?
Humans in modern society lack even the primal training granted to the "wild" human.
Humans do not train their young very well.
There are too many people.
etc.
The title was the topic sentance.
Reread. <3 REVSCRJ
I guess since I didn't mention Eminem and swear a lot it gets the brilliant comment, "What the fuck are you talking about?"
Excellent beginning to an intelligent discussion... socialized much?
to the above....what's so complicated....???what don't you get??? it's as plain as day.....take parenting seriously!!!if we as parents do not teach our young, how are they to learn the ways of the world???
Nik
I was talking to a friend o mine the other day about the concept of community childraising so as to make a better beast. He thought I was treading somewhere wherein Hitlers and the like are made (which REALLY pisses me off- I cant say the word "eugenics" without some reactionary dipshit yelling "Nazi" and thus, because most folk would rather be quiet than confrontational, we're supposed to have 12 billion humans- A YEAR OF SECONDS, a patron person for every second of every day through an entire fucking year)
Anyway, He imagined institutions raising children- like a forced summer camp crossed with prison painted in bright colors with bad murals whereas I was thinking local community trust-groups... y'know: your pack and your kin (or as Eminem fans in Tims town would say: "Yo'goddamn posse, yo.")
It got us on a odd drift: seems that the general lean of society as a mass is insectoid-hive based and that the "I-sacrifice-all-for-the-whole" mentality of the hive surely isnt anywhere in the mamalian instinct-package... not yet...
SEE: corporations are conglomerations of many individuals who act on behalf of the ENTITY that is THEM AS A WHOLE. Think about that. As a species we have make an "over" lifeform that has cells as us.
"This doesnt have Jack to do with raising children"
Yeah, yeah- Im getting to it.
Fuck. Lost my train of- oh right. So my friend- who imagined the institutional kiddie camps- owns his own business, has employees etc. and I, well, lemme put it this way: if he didnt have a computer I'd never post these things. Our basic difference is this: inately he accepts the hive for its Vulcan-logiclike efficency and structure, whereas I worship chaos, sleep outdoors, and befriend feral creatures so inately reject it.
Im not judging here, in fact I really just find the whole thing funny, but I realized that one of the biggest walls tween the species getting its act together is that he and I both exist in the same specieal era because nature is hedging her bets: should the exceptionally new experiment of "society" fail for the balding monkey there are folk like me [shudders inexplicably] who'd live on without a real change in overall happiness to suffering ratios, but the hybridization could create a form of life that uses concepts and charters, mission statements and religions (all things remember that the beast came up with on its own) AS ITS QUEEN BEES!!!
Good lord we are a really bizare animal.
So "raising children"....
If you think we should barrel for the hive state bear kids in tubes and raise them in megalithic bording schools whose students leave directly into their presumably rest-of-their-lifetime job OR if you think THAT is an abomination in YOUR sick-ass eyes, let alone Gods, then have friend you can trust alone with your children and throw rocks at the institution's windows.
<3
REVSCRJ
After reading a lot of on line forums I'm often amazed at how people react to comments made. So much of what we hear we generate ourselves, it takes a sensative person to listen to what's being said and not recontextualize it to suit their own agendas.
Case in point, your friend taking the idea of communal child raising and reshaping it as the hive destroying all attempts at individuality. When I suggested the communal raising of children I also said that this environment would allow a child to develop their individual talents to best effect. In my mind (and it seems you agree Rev) a communally raised child is taught more efficiently with a better chance of success because the child has a number of supports rather than just their parents. In our society if parents are abusive, alcholic or what have you, the child is often a write-off. In a communal environment the child still has plenty of other tools to become the best individual that they can. It's a matter of efficiency allowing for more freedom, not the other way around.
Your 'odd drift' is interesting. Perhaps being so successful and overpopulating the way we have is forcing us to change from our mammilian roots (which I'm trying to get back to in suggesting communal child raising). Perhaps we're being forced into the more efficient, but far less individualistic insect mode, by our own excesses. If that's the case then you might argue that all those successful capitalists who brought us wealth, comfort and lots of procreation have also delivered us directly into a system more communist than anything we could possibly have invented on our own.